User Manual | Solver settings | Solver time step (A)

(These setting are enabled through the application preferences.)

When the *override time step* setting is disabled, which is encouraged, the
solver uses a sophisticated method of automatically choosing an appropriate
isochrone time interval, based on a number of factors.

You are encouraged to use the automatic time step method, as it is generally
superior to a fixed interval.

Without going into great detail, the solver starts with an initial time
interval of 20 minutes, or smaller, depending on how close to land you
are. As the algorithm progresses, if the solver is encountering a lot of
land intersections, it may choose to keep the time increment small. If the
solver finds itself *sailing in open waters* then it starts to slowly
increase the time step.

Generally, the maximum isochrone interval the solver chooses is 2 hours.

As the solver sees that it is starting to approach the target point, it will start reducing its time step. This has the effect of generating additional isochrone points, which generate more accurate arrival information.

If you have a preference for generating all the isochrones at a single, fixed, uniform time interval then you can enable this setting and specify the interval.

One situation where *you may* want to set a fixed, small time increment, is
if you are comparing the results of the LuckGrib WR solver to another system.
Although, be aware that the results generated by LuckGrib may not be as good
when using a fixed time interval. The automatic time increment method can produce
superior results compared to a fixed time interval.

When comparing results between WR systems, you will likely want to do the comparison in LuckGrib, importing the other systems results via GPX files. LuckGrib has features which make doing the comparison easier than when doing it in other apps.

In this example open ocean passage, there are three paths generated, each with a different time step, and they are all essentially all the same. The time duration of the paths are, from left to right: 8 days 8.6 hours, 8 days 8.8 hours, 8 days 8.8 hours.

The largest difference between these three examples is the amount of time taken to compute the solution. On a 2017 13” Macbook Pro, the average of three runs for these examples is: 0.588 sec, 0.890 sec and 2.95 sec. (If you have experiences with a different weather routing system, how does its performance compare for these examples?)

**Using the automatic time step is highly recommended.**